Hi,
I am looking deeper inside gdi32 in order to continue helping wine after my first try on WidenPath.
Something looks strange to me in SetDIBColorTable and GetDIBColorTable.
GetDIBColorTable is structured like this :
if (dc->funcs->pGetDIBColorTable) result = dc->funcs->pGetDIBColorTable; else { result = local implementation; } return result;
This looks normal. If dc->funcs->pGetDIBColorTable is available, wine uses it, else it uses a local implementation. In both cases, the return value is the result of the chosen operation.
But I have more difficulties with SetDIBColorTable :
result = local implementation;
if (dc->funcs->pGetDIBColorTable) dc->funcs->pGetDIBColorTable;
return result;
Whatever happen next, the local implementation is used. Then if pGetDIBColorTable is available, it is used too. I see here a second call for the same thing, even if the local implementation succeed. Moreover, the result of dc->funcs->pGetDIBColorTable is not used as a return value. Is there a mistake here, or is there something I do not understand ?
GetDIBColorTable uses the local implementation only if dc->funcs is not available. That is not the case for SetDIBColorTable, which runs first the local implementation. What is the right policy to apply here ?
I believe the call order of pSetDIBColorTable and the fact its return value is not used are errors. Am i wrong? If someone can confirm I am not, I will provide a patch in the next days.
Thank you for your help and time,
Laurent Vromman