Dan Kegel wrote:
I think your approach is peachy, but Alexandre wanted a version check; look at his most recent post in this thread:
Alexandre wanted a version check when asked a different question. That question was when would we prefer an available native Richedit over the builtin one. (i.e. in the LoadLibrary("riched20") case).
I think if we get a loadlibrary on an explicit private path, we should load that dll natively, even if we have a builtin dll of the same name.
Cheers,
Jeremy