Re: widl: added dispinterface and coclass

[Mike Hearn]

Robert Shearman wrote:
> Sorry, I thought you were commenting on the patch.
> Widl still needs support for generating type format strings (and I 
> remember promising to Mike that I'd have a go at this) to generate any 
> non-trivial proxies/stubs.

Really? I thought that C/NDR based marshallers could marshal anything 
that MOPs could. But yeah, it'd be great to get widl generating all of 
these. Or, are you referring to code size?

thanks -mike