Re: Wine 32-bit address space

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Nick Burns"  writes:
> Ok that is understandable -- but if wine takes up the entire 4gb
> address space -- where are builtin libs supposed to live ((be
> mapped)/alloc to)?

There is free space between 0x60000000 and 0x80000000.
> Why not let builtin libs (like opengl) use that 3gb -> 4gb space
> (since wine does not use it)?
>
> But maybe that would cause problems if builtin libs returned addresses
> in that space? (not sure)

Yes, it would.