Does someone want to reign in this fuck-wit before she pisses of the whole community?
How can this be a dupe of a meta bug ?! The meta is supposed to regroup all such minor bugs. That's why it was created.
You say you want feedback, suggestions and bug reports yet this is what happens to constructive input.
Open source is about "if it does not do what you want , help fix it".
This comment indicates that once again she has not even read the fucking bug before dismissing it . May be you need to make ppl pass an english comprehension test before letting them edit bug reports.
Thanks fuck this nerd gets off on ranting on mailing lists, in real life she could do damage , well probably not actually, that's what it's all about.
Make of it what you like, I'm tired of pissing into the wind. See you all in 10 years time for 1.0
Best of luck to the majority who have put in all the hard work in creating a potencially excellent tool and dont think they're god's gift because of it.
I'm currently helping 5 first time user get used to Linux, my time will be better spent there.
Special thanks to Rob for the help he has given me.
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:13:16 +0100, Wine Bugs wine-bugs@winehq.org wrote:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4146
vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE------- Additional Comments From vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2005-25-12 10:13
This is all belongs in the manual. There were numerous discussions about this on wine-devel. Wine is not Windows and we do not do things in windows ways. It's ap to packagers to create any link on the desktop or menu. And Wine should not associate itself with *.exe files - again up to packagers.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 75 ***