10 Oct
2005
10 Oct
'05
4:35 p.m.
Dan Kegel wrote:
Marking the other bugs as duplicates of 2858 was probably fine, but I think we ought to leave 2858 open, or if we do not plan to fix it, mark it "WILLNOTFIX" rather than "FIXED". The instructions in the appdb are arguably a workaround rather than a fix.
I'm happy to do either, but I think it's probably better to keep it open.
Richard.