--- Vincent Béron vberon@mecano.gme.usherb.ca a écrit : > Le ven 08/11/2002 à 23:13, Sylvain Petreolle a écrit :
We should test if the db2xxxx or docbook2xxxx binaries are
available so
we could support both...
configure is where to do that. You do it? :)
configure.ac and his neighboors are a mystery for me at the moment :)
The unhiding of error messages is probably a good thing (especially if people report some problems). But if we first determine which one is installed (eg db2html or docbook2html), then what is the best way to handle the absence of any of those (aka "I can't build the doc")?
Fully agreed.
Last thing: make_winehq is not meant to build the documentation on a general basis. make doc is for that, and the html files are now correctly named with any one of the 2 patches I sent earlier (I think the second one will get sent to wine-patches). There are some differences between make_winehq and make doc: the first one buids each guide separatly, then a big one comprising the four (5 directories in total), and finally the same thing with another dsl, while make doc only builds the big one. So we may want to add a make target to build the different guides separately. But make_winehq is not the right thing to call if you don't place the result on a
website.
Agreed.
I must add one thing : make clean doesn't work for now. It removes *.tgz and others but the directories containing the old doc aren't removed.
Neither does 'make doc'. wine-doc is moved to wine-doc.junk by jade and that's all.
Or does it works with your patch ? Didn't have time to test it.
___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com