On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
I look forward to discussing this idea... perhaps we shouldn't bother to until after 1.0 is released, but I wanted to get it out early so the discussion can begin in time for us to move on it if we want to.
I think having semi-annual releases would be good but I don't think they should be tied to any distro. Popularity of Linux distributions shifts in the wind and with the ability for users to pull updates from the internet, being tied to a release is largely irrelevant. Having good criteria for semi-annual releases should be the topic at the next wineconf though, unless that criteria falls to the benevolent dictator in chief for life.