On Jan 12, 2015 12:56 AM, "Ken Sharp" imwellcushtymelike@googlemail.com wrote:
On 11/01/15 12:07, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 11.01.2015 14:33, Ken Sharp wrote:
{ "win7", "Windows 7", 6, 1,0x1DB1,VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 1", 1, 0, "WinNT"}, { "vista", "Windows Vista", 6, 0, 0x1772,VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 2", 2, 0, "WinNT"}, #ifdef _WIN64
- { "winxp64", "Windows XP", 5, 2, 0xECE,
VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 2", 2, 0, "WinNT"}, -#else
- { "winxp", "Windows XP", 5, 1, 0xA28,
VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 3", 3, 0, "WinNT"},
- { "winxp64", "Windows XP x64", 5, 2, 0xECE,
VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 2", 2, 0, "WinNT"}, #endif
- { "winxp", "Windows XP", 5, 1, 0xA28,
VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 3", 3, 0, "WinNT"},
If we're doing this it should be called "winxp" in both cases, we don't have "win764", so why XP should be different?
Because Windows XP and Windows XP x64 Edition are different versions
entirely.
Right, but there isn't the case where Windows xp is 64 bit and not xp64. A 64 bit prefix shouldn't be able to pretend to be a (non-existent) 32 bit version.