Re: [PATCH] AcceptEx Impelementation

[Dan Kegel]

Scott Lindeneau  wrote:
> The problem was related to a bug in the
> wineserver async implementation that appeared when a file descriptor
> handled its own polling events (like sockets) and garbage collection.
> Fixing the bug fixes the problem i was having earlier. Should I
> include those fixes in a separate patch or can I incorporate them into
> the acceptex patch? (Correct AcceptEx implementation relies on it).

If you can write a conformance test to expose the bug,
then please send that and a patch for the fix, e.g.
as the first two patches in a series:
  1/4 async test
  2/4 async fix
  3/4 acceptex test
  4/4 acceptex fix
If no separate test is possible, just fold it in to the AcceptEx patches.
Thanks!
- Dan