Dustin Navea wrote:
--- Tony Lambregts tony_lambregts@telusplanet.net wrote:
Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
Like Vincent said, the most convenient form of the doc (I think), fails when you do :
2b. make html
See bug #688 http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688
When I run "./make_winehq" (with the docbook packages installed) it produces the html files in wine-doc with meaningfull names but "make html" produces xNNNN files (just like bug report) so make_winehq is the prefered method, yes? Is it realy a bug then?
I think that at the beginning of the document we had a getting started section. This section would tell the developer that they needed to install have jade, tetex, docbook and perl installed in order to create html, pdf, and ps files from the sgml files. There should be links to the section on what is required for the various distrbutions and what command to run (./make_winhq).
Right now there is only the section for RedHat . I would be really nice if we had sections for other distributions as well
The sections on setting up the docbook from section 3.2.1.4 on needs work since it contains a lot of sections that are incomplete and to a large extent it is unclear (to me) what is required.
As I pointed out before there is a bug about this http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727
Right, I have it in my TODO
-Dustin
P.S. I will probably end up rewriting a lot of the docs to get them to a usable state, but it will take some time. Dimi: If you could post on the Wine 0.9 v0.x that a backup docs guy is needed, it would be greatly appreciated.
_
I am working on this based on what i have learned today. It won' t be complete I suppose but it should be better than what we have now. <g> Expect a patch soon (tm)