30 Jan
2009
30 Jan
'09
3:51 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com wrote:
The exception tests in ntdll is a nice example how to do that without hurting readability and maintainability.
Sure, it's doable, but after a while one's fingers begin to bleed. It all depends on how much code we're talking about, and how many people we expect to be able to write DOS testcases.
Do you see any harm in using nasm? I can't imagine it would be hard to update our list of build dependencies, and if anybody doesn't have it for some reason, no harm done...
- Dan
How about we merge in the wine16 tests while we're at it?
--
-Austin