Re: Fix for "Cluster size not supported" - resend

[Alexandre Julliard]

Rein Klazes  writes:
> Totals size of the file system should be f_blocks * f_frsize, but that
> gives a value 16 times too small. In this case f_blocks (as f_bfree,
> f_bavail) are the number of f_bsize blocks, wrong. This is a quite
> up-to-date system, Debian unstable with 2.6.10 kernel.
>
> Attached is the simplest solution, fall back to fstatfs() on Linux
> systems. It is btw also what 'df' does.

Wouldn't it be easier to simply use f_bsize instead of f_frsize?  Why
would switching to fstatfs be preferable?