Thanks for answers, let's just close the topic. There have been, sort of, agreement; and there were enough mails that I hope we understand each other. At this point, I think, further discussion would only be a waste of time and energy for everyone involved.
On 30.01.2019 21:12, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Konstantin Kharlamov hi-angel@yandex.ru writes:
Well, I guessed that by burden you mean code complexity. And I already replied on that one, at least in the mail with pros'n'cons. But you didn't reply, which made me think you might have meant something else on your mind. Discussion doesn't work when you expose your disagreement by a blunt force, such as silently rejecting patches.
Silently??? I believe that I've asked you at least 6 times so far to provide more convincing numbers. You are free to disagree with my judgment, but you can't claim that you don't know the reason for the rejection.