On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
I don't think tests passing on Windows is a reason for a release, it has very little impact on the Wine code. In the vast majority of cases these are tests that already succeed on Wine and on some Windows versions, so fixing them only involves making them less strict. That's not something users care about.
You could certainly make the argument that failing tests should block the release, but that doesn't imply that succeeding tests justify a release all by themselves.
I've been itching to do another release for a while, since what we have now is a lot better than 1.0. Your position has been that what's blocking release is the lack of a new feature (you listed several, any of which you felt would suffice).
How do you feel now? Are we close to having any of those features, and/or are you willing to consider dropping that requirement? - Dan