Re: kernel32: quiet a noisy err (2/3)

[Austin English]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Vincent Povirk
 wrote:
> You're setting quieterr to 0 initially, and the if condition will only
> be true if it is 1. The ERR will never be printed.
>
> Also, I think you should move the test for quieterr into the for loop,
> since all the loop does is print the ERR.
>
> Vincent Povirk
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Austin English  wrote:
> > --
> > -Austin

Whoops, sent the wrong one. Thanks for catching that. I'll resend shortly.