Re: ptrace differences in kernel 2.4.7

[eric pouech]

Simon Britnell wrote:
> Having reviewed the changelog for Linux 2.4.7, I find
> that the ptrace attach code was amalgamated from many
> architecture dependant files into one function :
> ptrace_attach.  This function differs from previous
> functions on i386 in that it returns EPERM if:

well, you said the error was 5 (EIO), so this EPERM stuff
shouldn't be in cause
could try to strace the wineserver when the ptrace fails
(it may should exactly what goes wrong)
A+