On 8/31/21 6:31 PM, Matteo Bruni wrote:
Signed-off-by: Matteo Bruni mbruni@codeweavers.com
I guess the original choice was mostly a "defensive" one: it's generally better to start with a restrictive grammar and then remove constraints as necessary rather than the other way around.
Sure. On the other hand, it's probably better to have less things result in a syntax error, so that you can emit more errors per run. But I don't mean to imply that the original code was unreasonable ;-)