Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de writes:
@@ -1937,7 +1937,6 @@ UINT codepage;
data->dwReserved0 = data->dwReserved1 = 0x0;
if (!lpFileName) return 0; if (lpFileName[0] == '\\' && lpFileName[1] == '\\') { ERR("UNC path name\n");
This first patch thunk wasn't in the patch I sent. Is this intentional?
Yes, I made a few changes to the patch, and in the process removed that redundant test.