Re: Resource accelerators discrepancies

[Alexandre Julliard]

Frédéric Delanoy  writes:
> After your addition of accelerators to po file for winefile (among
> others) [fe021a44 winefile: Add message contexts for accelerators that
> can be translated], there seems to be some discrepancies:

No, but you need to look up the resource definition to see all the
flags. That shouldn't matter for translating them.
> So,
> - is there a way/shouldn't the "label\tshortcut" menu entries be
>
> automated somehow? E.g. so the accelerator is automatically extracted

Not really.
> - is only the Control modifier shown in msgids? E.g. "X" while the
>
> shortcut is Alt-X. That's a bit inconsistent IMHO

That can't be avoided, unless we want to invent our own syntax for
specifying accelerators. Given how few we have, I don't think it's worth
the trouble. We could just as well kill the Alt-X shortcuts, they are
not really necessary.