Am 26.11.2015 um 09:25 schrieb Daniel Santos:
Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos daniel.santos@pobox.com
programs/winedbg/stack.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/programs/winedbg/stack.c b/programs/winedbg/stack.c index f49480a..8ef2dbc 100644 --- a/programs/winedbg/stack.c +++ b/programs/winedbg/stack.c @@ -307,6 +307,11 @@ static void stack_print_addr_and_args(int nf) im.ModuleName, (DWORD_PTR)(ihsf.InstructionOffset - im.BaseOfImage)); }
+static int addr_is_nonzero(const ADDRESS64 *addr) +{
- return addr->Offset && (addr->Mode != AddrModeFlat || addr->Segment);
+}
/******************************************************************
backtrace@@ -322,12 +327,24 @@ static void backtrace(void) dbg_curr_thread->curr_frame < dbg_curr_thread->num_frames; dbg_curr_thread->curr_frame++) {
dbg_printf("%s%d ",(cf == dbg_curr_thread->curr_frame ? "=>" : " "),dbg_curr_thread->curr_frame);stack_print_addr_and_args(dbg_curr_thread->curr_frame);
const unsigned nf = dbg_curr_thread->curr_frame;const ADDRESS64 *addr = &dbg_curr_thread->frames[nf].addr_frame;/* suppress bogus clone() frames from repeating */
Hi, any idea if the mentioned bug have the same reason https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39606
Regards Ralf