Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] server: Add USD support with timestamp updates.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Rémi Bernon  writes:
> If one page per process is preferable, then it can actually be passed
> to the client earlier, with possibly the version lookup done on the
> server side, and maybe the cpuinfo and page count as well if the
> values are identical for 32bit and 64bit processes?

I think you want one single page for the entire system. I have seen no
evidence that the version number not matching the per-process reported
version is a major issue in practice. Besides, the versions already
don't match in many other places like the registry and the version
resources.  Also, initializing the page contents could probably be
handled by wineboot.