Re: Bug 2931 (again)

[Michael Stefaniuc]

Hello,

Andreas Mohr wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:58:11PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 May 2005 21:11:40 -0500, Dustin Navea wrote:
> > > I was wondering if there was a better way to post them?  Ill keep that 
> > > in mind from now on.
> >
> > Well, I'm a bit dubious as to the value of posting bugs here anyway, we
> > have wine-bugs for that. If it really does motivate people to work on them
> > though then I guess it'd be OK.
>
> Many people don't subscribe to wine-bugs.
>
> If we have a few select bugs posted here (ones that are very interesting/
> important/critical/whatever), then this can only be a good thing.
> (as long as it does remain a moderate number of mails!)

Regressions bugs are quite interesting especialy if the culprit patch is 
already known

bye
    michael