On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 19:20:36 +0100, you wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 14:19:07 +0200, Rein Klazes wrote:
Mike's solution seems certain to work. Disadvantage is that it may break another program (that /needs/ the presence of this stub).
That's unlikely at this point. The activation context APIs are XP/Server2003 only, very very few apps (if any) will have a hard dependency on them.
Hmm, I thought adding stubs without any application using them was not approved of. Just for this reason: others make wrong assumptions on the basis of the availability of an API.
I agree we should fill out these APIs, but this could be a bit tricky. They are rather poorly explained on MSDN and appear to exist to support
Photoshop may need only a fraction of that API, perhaps only a refinement on the way this functions fails.
Rein.