Am Mit, 2002-09-25 um 20.57 schrieb Bill Medland:
OK. Here is where I have a slight problem. (I am quite prepared to accept that it may be because I am not thinking, I am missing or I am just an idiot).
You are moving in realms that I've not yet dared enter :)
But winemaker seems to be setting things up so that it will create /usr/local/lib/libshfile.dll.so.
This is because winemaker was designed to create winelib DLL replacements. I guess linking lib/wine/shfile.dll.so to lib/libshfile.so might do the job - right? Perhaps you also need to create an empty shfile.dll in your Windows\System directory, but now I am demonstrating that I'm ignorant.
Perhaps winemaker should be fixed such that both lib/wine/xyz.so and lib/libxyz.so are created. That'd be a fairly easy hack.
Martin