2017-12-08 16:14 GMT+01:00 Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Matteo Bruni matteo.mystral@gmail.com wrote:
I'd rather go in a slightly different direction for this i.e. see the attached patch.
I'm not rejecting your patch though.
Your patch is nicer, but it doesn't fix all GL errors (e.g. alpha test).
Er, right, for that it also needs the attached followup.
Anyway, your patch is probably a better fit for 3.0 (and it's complete, which is not the case for my patch). I'll keep rebasing my patches and hopefully send them soon after 3.0.