Re: [PATCH 4/4] winecfg: Cosmetic improvements to the about panel

[Alexandre Julliard]

Joel Holdsworth  writes:
> Are you sure? I really do think using PNGs is preferable. The PNG is
> 22.8kB, whereas a BMP would be 237.2kB - over 10x larger! If I use a
> BMP, it will make the winecfg executable bloat up 25%.
>
> By contrast importing GDI+ or WIC seems to me like a small price to pay.

We can add support for PNG icons after 1.2. Adding more dependencies to
winecfg is much more risky than a bloated icon.