Re: Winedbg: watchpoints broken?

[Walt Ogburn]

Hi Eric,

I suspected that might be the case.  It just takes a little bit of
guessing to find the previous expression, since its size is not fixed.

Thanks,
Walter
> > no, we should point to the correct insn, I'll look into it.
>
> in fact, it'll be hard to change it. ia-32 reports insn after the one
> that triggers the watch. The rationale beeing that you must execute the
> insn in order to now of the write change (unlike a seg fault where you
> cannot know execute the insn).
> GDB behaves the same (it shows the line after the one that triggered the
> watch).