On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com wrote:
I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about letting people build wine without a full complement of development headers. Maybe our configure should have a sanity check at the end, and abort if something optional but very common is missing; we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable configuring in that case if it's really intended.
We could have dotests check the config.log to see if there were any dependencies missing, and warn/fail as appropriate.
That only helps dotests. I'm thinking we should increase build quality of wine for other situations, too.