Re: [PATCH 1/3] winedos: better MSCDEX emulation

[Alexandre Julliard]

Petr Tesarik  writes:
> Now, I've found some (minor) bugs in the device driver code, and I
> fixed them along the way. IMO what you need is that:
> -
>
> First, I send a patch that moves the (buggy) code to a separate
> function which can be called both by the INT2F handler and by the
> interrupt routine.
> -
>
> Next, I send a patch fixing the bugs.
>
> Is that right?

Yes, each separate change must be a separate patch. If you are moving
code, you should send a patch that does just that, without changing
anything else. If you are fixing bugs send one patch per bug.