Re: msvcp60: Remove superfluous semicolons

[Jacek Caban]

On 11/26/12 22:35, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Jacek Caban wrote:
> > It's probably better to change the macro to require the semicolon.
> >
> > Jacek
>
> The reason I did it that way was because there are two variants of the
> DEFINE_CXX_DATA macro, surrounded by an #ifndef construct: one comprising
> three struct declarations, all ending in semicolons, the other comprised
> three struct declarations (ending in semicolons) and one function definition
> (ending in a curly brace). I suppose I could move the function above the
> structs, but that would require forward declarations.

Ah, sorry, missed the function there. Both solution seem equally fine then.

Jacek