9 Sep
2004
9 Sep
'04
2:44 p.m.
Yeah, not all of it does. This cleans it up.
Thanks,
/Ulrich
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 02:39:13PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
That read-only check looks completely bogus to me as the code below already checks for ES_READONLY.