Hugh McMaster hugh.mcmaster@outlook.com writes:
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 2:41 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
That's not the standard heap_alloc(), so a different name would be preferable. I'd suggest heap_xalloc by analogy with xmalloc.
"Standard" would be a function just returning HeapAlloc(...), right?
Yes, the one that we use in many places, and that Michael is going to move to a global header any day now ;-)
By the way, regedit should exit(0), but perhaps exit(1) - as in the patch - is still more appropriate for allocation failure?
Sure.