Re: [PATCH] netstat: Clarify labels in UDP statistics.

[Lauri Kenttä]

On 2013-02-09 23:15, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> "Invalid Datagrams" is too vague. It could mean datagrams sent or 
> received.

I think it's pretty obvious. Nobody should send invalid datagrams 
anyway, especially not using any actual datagram functions, so it would 
be ridiculous to have a counter for it.

On 2013-02-09 23:15, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> If you want to disambiguate/explain, use message contexts as explained
> in http://wiki.winehq.org/Translating

This isn't (only) a translation ambiguity issue, this is about the 
original texts, especially "No Ports".

Or are you trying to suggest that I add #msgctxt#udp_received_stats# to 
that "Invalid Datagrams"?