Re: Read/WriteProcessMemory fix

[Alexandre Julliard]

Andrew  writes:
> This fixes a bug in ReadProcessMemory and WriteProcessMemory, and
> rearranges some of the code. (In particular, all the code that knows
> that ptrace works in ints has been contained to server/ptrace.c.)

What bug is it fixing?

I'm not sure the reorganisation is a good idea; it seems less
efficient, less portable, and AFAICS broken for accesses of less than
an int size.