Re: Code cleanup: SHFileOperationW

[Mike Hearn]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:57:29 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> SHELL_internal_function() is a better way to go, IMO.  It's already the 
> Wine convention, you can easily locate the function, and it helps make 
> sure no two functions will be named the same thing.  There's no reason 
> to make a new convention just because you think the old one is "ugly".

Given the only reason we do this anymore is for etags/ctags I think I will
start investigating whether it's possible for a tags implementation to
restrict scope in tag searches. Because yes I do think the DLLNAME_ prefix
we have all over the place is ugly and unnecessary ...