On Tuesday 23 November 2004 14:07, Francois Gouget wrote:
What I meant is that we should check for one of these new APIs that we need, and if we don't find it we should just do as if lcms.h was missing.
Yes of course, I meant that too, and we should do that. But you presented this as a better solution for the breakage Gerald experienced than asking him to upgrade to lcms 1.13, which I don't agree with.
Building as if lcms.h is missing would result in a mostly non-functional MSCMS dll and especially with him being the maintainer of the FreeBSD Wine port (IIRC) that could affect a large number of people.
-Hans