Re: Exiting a tests on the first failure

[Alexandre Julliard]

Paul Vriens  writes:
> is it OK that have the above in a patch anyway, along with some extra
> debugging output? I will try and find a key we can use, but one problem
> could be that the failures are related to security (that's why I want to
> have the extra output as well).

We want more than extra debugging output, we really want the test to
fail so that someone looks into it. We can't just pretend that
everything is fine if we actually didn't run any test at all.