On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Austin English wrote: [...]
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
"Austin English" austinenglish@gmail.com writes:
I've been working on some of the documentation, then remembered that Scott requested a move to XML: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12217
There are quite a few programs to convert SGML to XML, and I've got a bit of time to kill. Alexandre, would you accept a move to XML, or would this be a waste of time?
[...]
Web/html/PDF/XML?
I would vote for DocBook XML so we can get Html and PDF documents out of it. Also now po4a works quite well with it. I could give you a hand on the po4a part.
However I'd say that there are some subtle but important differences between DocBook SGML and DocBook XML, especially around the include mechanism. So I'm a bit skeptical that automated tools can really produce clean DocBook XML code. But then they can probably be a good starting point.
It would also be nice if we could switch to a Git repository. Since it's not possible with SourceForge it would mean moving elsewhere. Would it be possible to have get it hosted on winehq.org?