Re: PATCH: glibc 2.3.x and errno

[Dan Kegel]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I'm afraid that won't be enough. When using thread-local storage,
> glibc doesn't even call __errno_location any more, it directly stores
> errno into the thread storage using %gs. It seems the only solution is
> to make Wine threads work on top of libc threads, but that will be
> messy.

Can you recap the main issues, or point us to where they were discussed
before?  (I probably have asked this several times in the past,
and apologize for sounding like a broken record.)
Is it simply that Windows threads can't be cleanly implemented on
top of Posix threads?
- Dan