On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Vit Hrachovy vit.hrachovy@sandbox.cz wrote:
Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
Btw, sorry all but I begins to be tired of telling same stuffs again and again. I made a proposal for something that *could* help the migration to final design, a *working* proposal, not just a prototype, and I believe on it. If that's not what most devels think, for me is ok. The engine will be available as a patch for whom needs/likes it, point.
Hi Max, would it be possible to craft a wikipage on Wine Wiki, that would encompass * official DIB implementation requirements * high level description of Huw's solution * description of Your solution incl. proposed integration plan
It would ease the orientation, prevent repeating the same stuff again and again and it could also serve as a solid base for further discussion about DIB integration requirements.
Regards Hark
I have asked Alexandre about it but it wasn't really an option. Even for Huw writing a full dib engine (if he resumed his current code) would take five months or so full time. Filling in the 'easy' bits (which Alexandre considers most of the things done so far) is not that much work (the easy bits are the software drawing functions).
Roderick