On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Scott Ritchie scott@open-vote.org wrote:
It's not that big a deal now, so long as the Hardy version (0.9.59 likely) stays around for a while ;)
I think Chris was planning on removing 0.9.59 from the list way before Hardy is unsupported. Chris?
Will Hardy upgrade to Wine 1.0 when it is released? I don't believe anyone is opposed to keeping particular important releases on the list but do we do that for distributions upon request? Only ones with lots of users of wine? The question I had was what results from an older version buy us or other users. If users can easily upgrade via using the winehq source in Ubuntu's then maybe it isn't as big of a deal. The reason for pruning the list was to avoid results from old versions and to simplify the test submission process by reducing the number of entries in that dropdown.
It seems like we need to come up with a criteria to pin versions.
I'll submit a bug for it on bugzilla today so we don't forget that we need to add that feature with the goal of having it before 1.0 is shipped but maybe we'll have it sooner.
Chris