On September 14, 2003 03:07 am, Eric Pouech wrote:
Another issue could be the (.so) dependencies on wine-calendar.dll.so which cannot be resolved.
I think you mean calendar-wrap.dll.so. Hmm, that would be very odd. Do you see any problem with these:
[dimi@dimi calendar]$ ldd calendar.exe.so libwine.so => /usr/local/lib/libwine.so (0x40029000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40040000) libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x40044000) libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x400f8000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4011a000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000) [dimi@dimi calendar]$ ldd calendar-wrap.dll.so libwine.so => /usr/local/lib/libwine.so (0x402f5000) libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x4030c000) libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x403bf000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x403e2000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x403ea000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
It seems to me calendar-wrap.dll.so has the same dependencies as calendar.exe.so (in a bit different order, does it matter?)