http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056911.html
Ah. That's not enough to judge where your patches are going. A series of patches, adding a stub program, then adding a little more to it, and so on, would help judge the final product, while considering each piece independently. It has the risk of getting rejected partway or wholesale, but has a higher likelihood of getting comments. It also removes a lot of the roundtrip time with patches.
Sorry if the guidance isn't very clear. Don't be afraid to ask AJ on irc for more feedback too. --Juan