Re: what's the proper way to define a COM interface that takes function pointers as arguments?

[Vincent Povirk]

Never mind. Henri has pointed out that I am on crack and this totally works.

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Vincent Povirk  wrote:
> I am trying to define the ICLRRuntimeHost interface.
>
> It has this method:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164410.aspx
>
> One of the arguments is a function pointer type:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa964757.aspx
>
> Widl fails when I try to define a function pointer type using C syntax.
>
> So, what's the proper way to do this?
>
> Does widl need to be fixed?