On 8/5/19 6:57 AM, Derek Lesho wrote:
I could, but then if Julliard wanted to pull in this patch without the others he'd have to perform a rebase.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:20 AM Rémi Bernon rbernon@codeweavers.com wrote:
You could probably move this after PATCH 5/9, so that you don't have to change those lines again. -- Rémi Bernon rbernon@codeweavers.com
I think if you do
msg_data->rawinput.mouse.data = input->mouse.data;
queue_hardware_message( desktop, msg, 0 ); }
+ if (device && device->flags & RIDEV_NOLEGACY) + return FALSE;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE( messages ); i++)
instead of
msg_data->rawinput.mouse.data = input->mouse.data;
queue_hardware_message( desktop, msg, 0 ); + + if (device->flags & RIDEV_NOLEGACY) + return FALSE; }
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE( messages ); i++)
then it would work the same for this patch (even if you keep it first in the serie), and you will not have to change it again later on.