2010/4/28 André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de:
confirmed by Mike Kaplinskiy
try 1 was on 4th November 2009
dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c index e6a6973..62598d2 100644 --- a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c +++ b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c @@ -2800,8 +2800,20 @@ int WINAPI WS_ioctlsocket(SOCKET s, LONG cmd, WS_u_long *argp) return 0;
case WS_SIOCATMARK:
- newcmd=SIOCATMARK;
- break;
- fd = get_sock_fd( s, 0, NULL );
- if (fd != -1)
- {
- if( ioctl(fd, newcmd, (char*)argp ) == 0 )
- {
- release_sock_fd( s, fd );
- /* return value must be inverted here */
- *argp = !*argp;
- return 0;
- }
- SetLastError((errno == EBADF) ? WSAENOTSOCK : wsaErrno());
- release_sock_fd( s, fd );
- }
- return SOCKET_ERROR;
case WS_FIOASYNC: WARN("Warning: WS1.1 shouldn't be using async I/O\n"); diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c b/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c index 88b62e3..7a7c688 100644 --- a/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c +++ b/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c @@ -2486,7 +2486,7 @@ static void test_ioctlsocket(void)
ret = ioctlsocket(sock, SIOCATMARK, &arg); if(ret != SOCKET_ERROR)
- todo_wine ok(arg, "expected a non-zero value\n");
- ok(arg, "expected a non-zero value\n");
}
static int drain_pause=0;
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Hey André,
I don't think we should rush this. The documentation says that the return values are basically opposites, but I think we need more tests with actual OOB data and different settings of SO_OOBINBLINE. MSDN has far too little information about SIOCATMARK and some things they say don't make a lot of sense.
Mike.