On Sunday 16 December 2007 21:14:16 James Hawkins wrote:
Ok, I'll start off the list. This is a first draft, open to changes and discussion. Entries with a (?) means I'm not sure.
Components:
[...]
wine-net ->
If you delete that one, we definitely need a "winsock" component. Or ws2_32... or wsock.. I prefer "winsock" as that matches the debug channel as well.
[...]
wine-sspi -> (?) I prefer individual modules with a security or sspi keyword, but it's not up to me
[...]
-> secur32
Coming to think about that, if we're fine to add more categories for things like secur32.dll, how about splitting up those by debug channel? E.g. my ntlm provider has an "ntlm" debug channel, the kerberos provider that I keep starting and restarting in some branches on my box always uses "kerberos", and Juan might want to use schannel as debug channel.
That would also help advanced users to correctly file bugs according to fixmes, e.g. if they run into an unimplemented function.
Cheers, Kai