Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
This is the initial TODO for Wine 0.8.
I know, 0.8 has been released before, but that's ancient history. Whether or not it gets released with this version number is irrelevant. In fact, even if it never becomes a public release, it is an important point to reach toward 0.9, and so if we complete this work, it would have solved its purpose.
Hello Dimi, List
This is exact same question that I brought up when I did the TODO's update on the status page :) I ask if TODO's should be .9/1.0 ToDo's ??? Or just ToDo's in general. Maybe after all this is hashed out I can go back and re-do the todo's section of the status page.....
0.8.0 ToDo's
0.9.0 ToDo's
1.0.0 ToDo's
That is what I wanted to do ... but wanting and doing is two very differant things.. First off I am very new to Wine my self and I just jumped in and and started with status page updates. Why ?? Because I think if a new user comes and looks at the frontpage and then ( what is Wine? ) then ohh shit there is a status page :) :) Then they look and it has not been updated in a YEAR !!! Then they have NO Freaken IDEA about the current status of Wine .... So I ask Alexandre if he would update it :) And I recieved a nice reply .. I would like for someone to volinteer to do this .. And here I am ...
Is the Status page up to date ?? @#*% NO ... I need to add in alot of missing parts.. dlls/shlwapi is a good example Marcus Meissner as worker for : ole32, oleaut32. Jukka Heinonen as worker on WineDos I have not made one single change to the Status of any of the Documentation !!
Then in the future if ** YOU** make a change to comctl32/listview and if you feel the status has went from say 5% to 10% -- ( the Status page goes in 5% increments.. ) And at the same time you have done some work on the DOC's .. All you need to do is send me a message and say ..... Hey, comctl32 is now --% and the DOC status is now whatever .. And ill update it ! and reflect the change in the Change Log.
The way it is now I Search around for who is working on what .. And then PESTER the info out of them ;) I don't like doing it this way. But it is the only way I have at this time.
I just want to say thanks to everyone who replied and gave Feed Back ( it really helps ) And since im new here I can't just make %% up off the top of my head and wait for someone to say .. What the HELL that is not 85% its more like 60% then change it to what it really is .. Tho it did think about it a time or two :)
Thomas Wickline