Re: A new systray patch

[Shachar Shemesh]

Mike Hearn wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > Though, if we would want to support shell extensions, I don't see how 
> > we could effectively do it without having it do everything the native 
> > explorer does....
>
> That would be the other reason. But, I think it makes more sense to 
> try and bridge shell extensions to Nautilus/Konqueror rather than 
> reimplement Explorer-the-file-manager. At least, that's what I'd try 
> first.
>
> Flip side is I'm not aware of any shell extensions people want to run 
> on Wine, at least, not yet ...

I'd love to get my digital camera syncing on Linux (Mustek). It uses a 
shell extension. Good enough reason for you? :-)

Shachar